receiving <<< isakmp oak info *(hash, notify:no_proposal_chosen) from x.x.x.x 1344 21:17:30.812 09/22/08 Sev=Info/4 IKE/0x63000013 SENDING >>> ISAKMP OAK INFO *(HASH, DEL) to x.x.x.x

VPN - "No Proposal Chosen" Last week I got a new ZyWALL 2 for home and set up a new VPN rule on the office Z10II. Set it up on the Z2 and was connected in a matter of minutes. no_proposal_chosen on ipsec vpn « on: January 02, 2017, 03:48:40 am » I am setting up an IPSEC VPN between a new OPNsense 16.7.12 VM and a Cisco ASA using a configuration similar to what I normally use with pfSense 2.3.2. no_proposal_chosen. Indicates there is a mismatch of proposals during phase 1 or phase 2 negotiation between a site-to-site VPN. Received notify: INVALID_ID_INFO. May 23, 2016 · "No Proposal Chosen' message. Check VPN IKE diagnostic log messages on the remote gateway endpoint for more information." However, when I check the Vyatta's logs, I get the following: "May 23 08:39:41 teefw01 pluto[6464]: "peer-104.xxx.xxx.xxx-tunnel-1" #302: sending notification NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN to 104.xxx.xxx.xxx:500 IPSEC tunnel problem : no SA proposal chosen hello, i have a problem with a site-to-site VPN i'm currently on fortigate VM-64 (Firmware Versionv5.0,build3608 (GA Patch 7)) the other end is a livebox pro (from france), which is emulating a cisco router this is what i have in the logs on fortigate : Cisco device sends back NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN if it does not find any matching policy for the proposal. Otherwise, the Cisco device sends the set of parameters chosen. NSX Edge to Cisco . To facilitate debugging, you can enable IPSec logging on the NSX Edge and enable crypto debug on Cisco (debug crypto isakmp ). I am trying to setup Site to site VPN. I am getting: Received notify. NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN in Sonicwall logs and the VPN is not setup. It looks like the phase 1 is OK as I am getting: Info VPN IKE IKE Initiator: Start Quick Mode (Phase 2). SONIC_WALL_IP, 500 CISCO_IP, 500 VPN Policy: test in the sonicwall logs just before NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN message.

Event Log: "no-proposal-chosen received" (Phase 1) Event Log: "no-proposal-chosen received" (Phase 2) Event Log: "failed to pre-process ph2 packet/failed to get sainfo" Event Log: "invalid flag 0x08" Event Log: "exchange Aggressive not allowed in any applicable rmconf" Event Log: "exchange Identity Protection not allowed in any applicable rmconf."

Scenario 7: Site to site with DAIP Gateway fail with "No Proposal Chosen" sent by the central Gateway. Product: IPSec VPN, Symptoms: Site to site with DAIP Gateway fail with "No Proposal Chosen" sent by the central Gateway; SHA384 is defined as Data Integrity for Main Mode. One of the peers defined as Dynamic IP Gateway and installed with R77 Tunnel is down between Check Point Gateways with " No Proposal chosen ," fails in phase 1 packet 1 or packet 2 (Main mode). tcpdump shows that the traffic is going back and forth between Security Gateways for ISAKMP/phase1 port 500. NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN, preceded the PHASE 1. Process Done: This means that phase1 has expired and that the problem is now in phase2. Then review the phase2 algorithms and the networks that are declared in the Local Policy and Remote Policy fields. Palo Alto: VPN Phase 2 kann nicht aufgebaut werden: Fehler in Syslog “IKE protocol notification message received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN (14)” Der Fehler IKE protocol notification message received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN (14) zeigte nicht wie zuerst gedacht an, dass ein Proposal “nicht ausgewählt wurde” sondern, dass im konkreten Fall NOPFS

It this particular scenario there was no routing issues and ISAKMP was enabled on the outside so at this point you need to start with basics. That being said with NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN it might mean we have a mismatch somewhere on phase 1 of our VPN tunnel. Verifying your policy proposals for IKEv1 and matching it with your peer is your next step.

Tunnel is down between Check Point Gateways with " No Proposal chosen ," fails in phase 1 packet 1 or packet 2 (Main mode). tcpdump shows that the traffic is going back and forth between Security Gateways for ISAKMP/phase1 port 500. NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN, preceded the PHASE 1. Process Done: This means that phase1 has expired and that the problem is now in phase2. Then review the phase2 algorithms and the networks that are declared in the Local Policy and Remote Policy fields. Palo Alto: VPN Phase 2 kann nicht aufgebaut werden: Fehler in Syslog “IKE protocol notification message received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN (14)” Der Fehler IKE protocol notification message received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN (14) zeigte nicht wie zuerst gedacht an, dass ein Proposal “nicht ausgewählt wurde” sondern, dass im konkreten Fall NOPFS